Selective Uptake of Macromolecules to the Brain in Microfluidics and Animal Models Using the HAVN1 Peptide as a Blood-Brain Barrier Modulator.

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) possess favorable pharmacokinetic properties, high binding specificity and affinity, and minimal off-target effects, making them promising therapeutic agents for central nervous system (CNS) disorders. However, their development as effective therapeutic and diagnostic agents for brain disorders is hindered by their limited ability to efficiently penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Therefore, it is crucial to develop efficient delivery methods that enhance the penetration of antibodies into the brain. Previous studies have demonstrated the potential of cadherin-derived peptides (i.e., ADTC5, HAVN1 peptides) as BBB modulators (BBBMs) to increase paracellular porosities for penetration of molecules across the BBB. Here, we test the effectiveness of the leading BBBM peptide, HAVN1 (Cyclo(1,6)SHAVSS), in enhancing the permeation of various monoclonal antibodies through the BBB using both in vitro and in vivo systems. In vitro, HAVN1 has been shown to increase the permeability of fluorescently labeled macromolecules, such as a 70 kDa dextran, 50 kDa Fab1, and 150 kDa mAb1, by 4- to 9-fold in a three-dimensional blood-brain barrier (3D-BBB) microfluidics model using a human BBB endothelial cell line (i.e., hCMEC/D3). HAVN1 was selective in modulating the BBB endothelial cell, compared to the pulmonary vascular endothelial (PVE) cell barrier. Co-administration of HAVN1 significantly improved brain depositions of mAb1, mAb2, and Fab1 in C57BL/6 mice after 15 min in the systemic circulation. Furthermore, HAVN1 still significantly enhanced brain deposition of mAb2 when it was administered 24 h after the administration of the mAb. Lastly, we observed that multiple doses of HAVN1 may have a cumulative effect on the brain deposition of mAb2 within a 24-h period. These findings offer promising insights into optimizing HAVN1 and mAb dosing regimens to control or modulate mAb brain deposition for achieving desired mAb dose in the brain to provide its therapeutic effects.

Translatability of In Vitro Stress for Predicting Deamidation and Oxidation Biotransformation on Biotherapeutics.

Biotransformation leading to single residue modifications (e.g., deamidation, oxidation) can contribute to decreased efficacy/potency, poor pharmacokinetics, and/or toxicity/immunogenicity for protein therapeutics. Identifying and characterizing such liabilities in vivo are emerging needs for biologics drug discovery. In vitro stress assays involving PBS for deamidation or AAPH for oxidation are commonly used for predicting liabilities in manufacturing and storage and are sometimes considered a predictive tool for in vivo liabilities. However, reports discussing their in vivo translatability are limited. Herein, we introduce a mass spectrometry workflow that characterizes in vivo oxidation and deamidation in pharmacokinetically relevant compartments for diverse protein therapeutic modalities. The workflow has low bias of <10% in quantitating degradation in the relevant pharmacokinetic concentration range for monkey and rabbit serum/plasma (1-100 µg/mL) and allows for high sequence coverage (∼85%) for discovery/monitoring of amino acid modifications. For oxidation and deamidation, the assay was precise, with percent coefficient of variation of <8% at 1-100 µg/mL and ≤6% method-induced artifacts. A high degree of in vitro and in vivo correlation was observed for deamidation on the six diverse protein therapeutics (seven liability sites) tested. In vivo translatability for oxidation liabilities were not observed for the 11 molecules tested using in vitro AAPH stress. One of the molecules dosed in eyes resulted in a false positive and a false negative prediction for in vivo oxidation following AAPH stress. Finally, peroxide stress was also tested but resulted in limited success (1 out of 4 molecules) in predicting oxidation liabilities.

End-to-End Approach to Surfactant Selection, Risk Mitigation, and Control Strategies for Protein-Based Therapeutics.

A survey performed by the AAPS Drug Product Handling community revealed a general, mostly consensus, approach to the strategy for the selection of surfactant type and level for biopharmaceutical products. Discussing and building on the survey results, this article describes the common approach for surfactant selection and control strategy for protein-based therapeutics and focuses on key studies, common issues, mitigations, and rationale. Where relevant, each section is prefaced by survey responses from the 22 anonymized respondents. The article format consists of an overview of surfactant stabilization, followed by a strategy for the selection of surfactant level, and then discussions regarding risk identification, mitigation, and control strategy. Since surfactants that are commonly used in biologic formulations are known to undergo various forms of degradation, an effective control strategy for the chosen surfactant focuses on understanding and controlling the design space of the surfactant material attributes to ensure that the desired material quality is used consistently in DS/DP manufacturing. The material attributes of a surfactant added in the final DP formulation can influence DP performance (e.g., protein stability). Mitigation strategies are described that encompass risks from host cell proteins (HCP), DS/DP manufacturing processes, long-term storage, as well as during in-use conditions.

Insights into ultra-low affinity lipase-antibody noncovalent complex binding mechanisms.

Detection of host cell protein (HCP) impurities is critical to ensuring that recombinant drug products, including monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), are safe. Mechanistic characterization as to how HCPs persist in drug products is important to refining downstream processing. It has been hypothesized that weak lipase-mAb interactions enable HCP lipases to evade drug purification processes. Here, we apply state-of-the-art methods to establish lipase-mAb binding mechanisms. First, the mass spectrometry (MS) approach of fast photochemical oxidation of proteins was used to elucidate putative binding regions. The CH1 domain was identified as a conserved interaction site for IgG1 and IgG4 mAbs against the HCPs phospholipase B-like protein (PLBL2) and lysosomal phospholipase A2 (LPLA2). Rationally designed mutations in the CH1 domain of the IgG4 mAb caused a 3- to 70-fold KD reduction against PLBL2 by surface plasmon resonance (SPR). LPLA2-IgG4 mutant complexes, undetected by SPR and studied using native MS collisional dissociation experiments, also showed significant complex disruption, from 16% to 100%. Native MS and ion mobility (IM) determined complex stoichiometries for four lipase-IgG4 complexes and directly interrogated the enrichment of specific lipase glycoforms. Confirmed with time-course and exoglycosidase experiments, deglycosylated lipases prevented binding, and low-molecular-weight glycoforms promoted binding, to mAbs. This work demonstrates the value of integrated biophysical approaches to characterize micromolar affinity complexes. It is the first in-depth structural report of lipase-mAb binding, finding roles for the CH1 domain and lipase glycosylation in mediating binding. The structural insights gained offer new approaches for the bioengineering of cells or mAbs to reduce HCP impurity levels.Abbreviations: CAN, Acetonitrile; AMAC, Ammonium acetate; BFGS, Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno; CHO, Chinese Hamster Ovary; KD, Dissociation constant; DTT, Dithiothreitol; ELISA, Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; FPOP, Fast photochemical oxidation of proteins; FA, Formic acid; F(ab'), Fragment antibodies; HCP, Host cell protein; IgG, Immunoglobulin; IM, Ion mobility; LOD, Lower limit of detection; LPLA2, Lysosomal phospholipase A2; Man, Mannose; MS, Mass spectrometry; MeOH, Methanol; MST, Microscale thermophoresis; mAbs, Monoclonal antibodies; PPT1, Palmitoyl protein thioesterase; ppm, Parts per million; PLBL2, Phospholipase B-like protein; PLD3, Phospholipase D3; PS-20, Polysorbate-20; SP, Sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase; SPR, Surface plasmon resonance; TFA, Trifluoroacetic acid.

Physicochemical and biological impact of metal-catalyzed oxidation of IgG1 monoclonal antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates via reactive oxygen species.

Biotherapeutics are exposed to common transition metal ions such as Cu(II) and Fe(II) during manufacturing processes and storage. IgG1 biotherapeutics are vulnerable to reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated via the metal-catalyzed oxidation reactions. Exposure to these metal ions can lead to potential changes to structure and function, ultimately influencing efficacy, potency, and potential immunogenicity of the molecules. Here, we stress four biotherapeutics of the IgG1 subclass (trastuzumab, trastuzumab emtansine, anti-NaPi2b, and anti-NaPi2b-vc-MMAE) with two common pharmaceutically relevant metal-induced oxidizing systems, Cu(II)/ ascorbic acid and Fe(II)/ H2O2, and evaluated oxidation, size distribution, carbonylation, Fc effector functions, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity, cell anti-proliferation and autophaghic flux. Our study demonstrates that the extent of oxidation was metal ion-dependent and site-specific, leading to decreased FcγRIIIa and FcRn receptor binding and subsequently potentially reduced bioactivity, though antigen binding was not affected to a great extent. In general, the monoclonal antibody (mAb) and corresponding antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) showed similar impacts to product quality when exposed to the same metal ion, either Cu(II) or Fe(II). Our study clearly demonstrates that transition metal ion binding to therapeutic IgG1 mAbs and ADCs is not random and that oxidation products show unique structural and functional ramifications. A critical outcome from this study is our highlighting of key process parameters, route of degradation, especially oxidation (metal catalyzed or via ROS), on the CH1 and Fc region of full-length mAbs and ADCs.Abbreviations: DNPH 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine; ADC Antibody drug conjugate; ADCC Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity; CDR Complementary determining region; DTT Dithiothreitol; HMWF high molecular weight form; LC-MS Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; LMWF low molecular weight forms; MOA Mechanism of action; MCO Metal-catalyzed oxidation; MetO Methionine sulfoxide; mAbs Monoclonal antibodies; MyBPC Myosin binding protein C; ROS Reactive oxygen species; SEC Size exclusion chromatography.

Translational Approaches for Brain Delivery of Biologics via Cerebrospinal Fluid.

Delivery of biologics via cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has demonstrated potential to access the tissues of the central nervous system (CNS) by circumventing the blood-brain barrier and blood-CSF barrier. Developing an effective CSF drug delivery strategy requires optimization of multiple parameters, including choice of CSF access point, delivery device technology, and delivery kinetics to achieve effective therapeutic concentrations in the target brain region, whereas also considering the biologic modality, mechanism of action, disease indication, and patient population. This review discusses key preclinical and clinical examples of CSF delivery for different biologic modalities (antibodies, nucleic acid-based therapeutics, and gene therapy) to the brain via CSF or CNS access routes (intracerebroventricular, intrathecal-cisterna magna, intrathecal-lumbar, intraparenchymal, and intranasal), including the use of novel device technologies. This review also discusses quantitative models of CSF flow that provide insight into the effect of fluid dynamics in CSF on drug delivery and CNS distribution. Such models can facilitate delivery device design and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic translation from preclinical species to humans in order to optimize CSF drug delivery to brain regions of interest.

Stress Factors in Primary Packaging, Transportation and Handling of Protein Drug Products and Their Impact on Product Quality.

Protein-based biologic drugs encounter a variety of stress factors during drug substance (DS) and drug product (DP) manufacturing, and the subsequent steps that result in clinical administration by the end user. This article is the third in a series of commentaries on these stress factors and their effects on biotherapeutics. It focuses on assessing the potential negative impact from primary packaging, transportation, and handling on the quality of the DP. The risk factors include ingress of hazardous materials such as oxidizing residuals from the sterilization process, delamination- or rubber stopper-derived particles, silicone oil droplets, and leachables into the formulation, as well as surface interactions between the protein and packaging materials, all of which may cause protein degradation. The type of primary packaging container used (such as vials and prefilled syringes) may substantially influence the impact of transportation and handling stresses on DP Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs). Mitigations via process development and robustness studies as well as control strategies for DP CQAs are discussed, along with current industry best practices for scale-down and in-use stability studies. We conclude that more research is needed on postproduction transportation and handling practices and their implications for protein DP quality.

Stress Factors in Protein Drug Product Manufacturing and Their Impact on Product Quality.

Injectable protein-based medicinal products (drug products, or DPs) must be produced by using sterile manufacturing processes to ensure product safety. In DP manufacturing the protein drug substance, in a suitable final formulation, is combined with the desired primary packaging (e.g., syringe, cartridge, or vial) that guarantees product integrity and enables transportation, storage, handling and clinical administration. The protein DP is exposed to several stress conditions during each of the unit operations in DP manufacturing, some of which can be detrimental to product quality. For example, particles, aggregates and chemically-modified proteins can form during manufacturing, and excessive amounts of these undesired variants might cause an impact on potency or immunogenicity. Therefore, DP manufacturing process development should include identification of critical quality attributes (CQAs) and comprehensive risk assessment of potential protein modifications in process steps, and the relevant steps must be characterized and controlled. In this commentary article we focus on the major unit operations in protein DP manufacturing, and critically evaluate each process step for stress factors involved and their potential effects on DP CQAs. Moreover, we discuss the current industry trends for risk mitigation, process control including analytical monitoring, and recommendations for formulation and process development studies, including scaled-down runs.

Metal Ion Interactions with mAbs: Part 2. Zinc-Mediated Aggregation of IgG1 Monoclonal Antibodies.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the physical and chemical degradation of monoclonal antibodies in the presence of Zn2+. METHODS: A full length IgG1 monoclonal antibody (mAb1) was formulated with various amounts of Zn2+. The resulting mixture was incubated for several weeks at room temperature and analyzed using a variety of biochemical techniques to look for various physical (e.g. aggregation) and chemical (e.g. fragmentation) degradation pathways. RESULTS: mAb1 of the IgG1 subclass undergoes aggregation in the presence of Zn2+ in a concentration dependent manner. Up to hexamers were characterized using SEC-MALS. No fragmentation was noticed in the presence of Zn2+ as opposed to that found in our previous report when IgG1 mAbs were incubated in the presence of Cu2+ ions. Site directed mutagenesis indicated the involvement of Fc histidine (His 310) in Zn2+ mediated aggregation. CONCLUSIONS: A novel metal ion mediated isodesmic aggregation mechanism was found in IgG1 class of monoclonal antibodies. Histidine residues in the Fc region were determined to be the binding site and implicated in Zn2+ mediated aggregation.

A Comprehensive Assessment of All-Oleate Polysorbate 80: Free Fatty Acid Particle Formation, Interfacial Protection and Oxidative Degradation.

PURPOSE: Enzymatic polysorbate (PS) degradation and resulting free fatty acid (FFA) particles are detrimental to biopharmaceutical drug product (DP) stability. Different types and grades of polysorbate have varying propensity to form FFA particles. This work evaluates the homogenous all-oleate (AO) PS80 alongside heterogeneous PS20 and PS80 grades in terms its propensity to form FFA particles and other important attributes like interfacial protection and oxidation susceptibility. METHODS: FFA particle formation rates were compared by degrading PS using non-immobilized hydrolases and fast degrading DP formulations. Interfacial protection of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) was assessed by agitation studies in saline using non-degraded and degraded PS. Several antioxidants were assessed for their ability to mitigate AO PS80 oxidation and subsequent mAb oxidation by a 40°C placebo stability study and a 2, 2'-Azobis (2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride stress model, respectively. RESULTS: Visible and subvisible particles were significantly delayed in AO PS80 formulations compared with heterogeneous PS20 and PS80 formulations. Non-degraded AO PS80 was less protective of mAbs against the air-water interface compared with heterogeneous PS20. Interfacial protection by AO PS80 improved upon degradation owing to high surface activity of FFAs. Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) completely mitigated AO PS80 oxidation unlike L-methionine and N-Acetyl-DL-Tryptophan. However, DTPA did not mitigate radical mediated mAb oxidation. CONCLUSION: AO PS80 is a promising alternative to reduce FFA particle formation compared with other PS types and grades. However, limitations observed here---such as lower protection against interfacial stresses and higher propensity for oxidation---need to be considered in assessing the risk/benefit ratio in using AO PS80.

Optimizing Hydroxyl Radical Footprinting Analysis of Biotherapeutics Using Internal Standard Dosimetry.

Hydroxyl radical footprinting-mass spectrometry (HRF-MS) is a powerful technique for measuring protein structure by quantitating the solvent accessibility of amino acid side-chains; and when used in comparative analysis, HRF-MS data can provide detailed information on changes in protein structure. However, consistently controlling the amount of hydroxyl radical labeling of a protein requires the precise understanding of both the amount of radicals generated and half-life of the radicals in solution. The latter is particularly important for applications such as protein-protein and protein-ligand interactions, which may have different characteristics such as intrinsic reactivity and buffer components, and can cause differences in radical scavenging (herein termed "scavenging potential") between samples. To address this inherent challenge with HRF-MS analysis, we describe the comprehensive implementation of an internal standard (IS) dosimeter peptide leucine enkephalin (LeuEnk) for measuring the scavenging potential of pharmaceutically relevant proteins and formulation components. This further enabled evaluation of the critical method parameters affecting the scavenging potential of samples subjected to HRF-MS using fast photochemical oxidation of proteins. We demonstrate a direct correlation between the oxidation of the IS peptide and biotherapeutic target proteins, and show the oxidation of the IS can be used as a guide for ensuring equivalent scavenging potentials when comparing multiple samples. Establishing this strategy enables optimization of sample parameters, a system suitability approach, normalization of data, and comparison/harmonization of HRF-MS analysis across different laboratories.

Protein Stability and Photostability under In Vitro Vitreal Conditions - Implications for Long Acting Delivery of Protein Therapeutics for Ocular Disease.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the stability of a model Mab1 and Fab1 under in vitro vitreal conditions in the presence of various metabolites and in the presence of light at λ > 400 nM. METHODS: A full length IgG1 monoclonal antibody (Mab1) and a fab fragment (Fab1) were formulated with various metabolites typically found in the vitreous humor and subjected to visible light treatment. Both proteins were analyzed using a variety of biochemical techniques. Furthermore, Fab1 was also tested for antigen binding ability using surface plasmon resonance. RESULTS: Our data shows that some vitreal metabolites such as riboflavin and ascorbic acid affect protein stability, via formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and advanced glycation end products (AGE) s respectively. In contrast, metabolites such as glutathione may protect these proteins from light-induced degradation to some extent. CONCLUSIONS: Ascorbic acid and riboflavin were found to photosensitize therapeutic proteins especially when exposed to light. Ascorbic acid reacted with proteins even in the absence of light. Antioxidants such as glutathione helped limit photooxidation under ambient or blue light exposure. Since antioxidant capacity in the eye decreases with age we recommend understanding long term stability, including photooxidation and photosensitization, of new candidate proteins in the context of controlled or sustained release technologies for ocular diseases.

Stress Factors in mAb Drug Substance Production Processes: Critical Assessment of Impact on Product Quality and Control Strategy.

The success of biotherapeutic development heavily relies on establishing robust production platforms. During the manufacturing process, the protein is exposed to multiple stress conditions that can result in physical and chemical modifications. The modified proteins may raise safety and quality concerns depending on the nature of the modification. Therefore, the protein modifications potentially resulting from various process steps need to be characterized and controlled. This commentary brings together expertise and knowledge from biopharmaceutical scientists and discusses the various manufacturing process steps that could adversely impact the quality of drug substance (DS). The major process steps discussed here are commonly used in mAb production using mammalian cells. These include production cell culture, harvest, antibody capture by protein A, virus inactivation, polishing by ion-exchange chromatography, virus filtration, ultrafiltration-diafiltration, compounding followed by release testing, transportation and storage of final DS. Several of these process steps are relevant to protein DS production in general. The authors attempt to critically assess the level of risk in each of the DS processing steps, discuss strategies to control or mitigate protein modification in these steps, and recommend mitigation approaches including guidance on development studies that mimic the stress induced by the unit operations.

Challenges of Using Closed System Transfer Devices With Biological Drug Products: An Industry Perspective.

Hazardous drug is a common term used by the National Institute of Occupational Health and Safety (NIOSH) to classify medications that may induce adverse mutagenic and reproductive responses in health care personnel. NIOSH publishes a list of drugs it defines as hazardous where it may be appropriate for health care workers to take protective measures to reduce the potential for occupational exposure. Recent updates and proposed updates to this list have included large molecule biological products with oncology indications. Both NIOSH and USP <800> recommend the use of closed system transfer devices (CSTDs) during compounding. CSTDs are required for administration of prepared solution in NIOSH. However, USP has suggested that the principles of <800> are broadly applicable to hazardous drug handling activities across all facility types. USP encourages the widespread adoption and use of <800> across all health care settings, which many health care workers have interpreted beyond compounding to include administration and preparation of conventionally manufactured sterile products per approved labeling. Although the use of CSTDs may reduce exposure of health care personnel to chemotherapy agents in health care setting, the impact of CSTDs on quality of biologic drug products, including monoclonal antibodies and other proteins, is not fully understood. To complicate this issue further, there are several commercially available CSTDs in the market which have different fluid paths and material of construction that comes in contact with the drug. Testing every combination of CSTD and drug product for potential incompatibilities can be a labor intensive and impractical approach and cause delay in getting essential drugs to patients. A panel discussion was held at a recent American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2018 PharmSci 360 conference to discuss the impact of CSTDs on biologics. Impact on subvisible and visible particulates and impact to other product quality attributes such as high molecular weight species formation upon contact with CSTDs were reported in American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists meeting. Impact to deliverable dose, holdup volumes of various CSTDs, and stopper coring were also reported that has significant impact to patient safety. Given the fact that USP chapter <800> will be implemented in December 2019, feedback from health authorities regarding the use of CSTDs for biological drug products is needed to provide an appropriate risk/benefit balance to ensure patient safety and quality of the biologic drug product while also protecting the health care worker and the environment. The purpose of this commentary is to provide an industry perspective on the challenges during the use of CSTDs for biologic drug products and is intended to raise caution and awareness on the benefits and shortcomings of these devices.

Trehalose Limits Fragment Antibody Aggregation and Influences Charge Variant Formation in Spray-Dried Formulations at Elevated Temperatures.

The preparation of PLGA rods for sustained release applications via a hot-melt extrusion process employs heat and mechanical shear. Understanding protein stability and degradation mechanisms at high temperature in the solid state is therefore important for the preparation of protein-loaded PLGA rods. The stability of a model protein, labeled Fab2, has been investigated in solid-state formulations containing trehalose at elevated temperatures. Spray-dried formulations containing varying levels of trehalose were exposed to temperatures ranging from 90 to 120 °C. Measurement of aggregation and chemical degradation rates suggests that trehalose limits Fab2 degradation in a concentration-dependent manner, but the effect tends to saturate when the mass ratio of trehalose to protein is around 1 in the solid formulation. The Fab2 secondary structure and spray-dried particle morphology were studied using circular dichroism and scanning electron microscopy techniques, respectively. On the basis of temperature and trehalose-dependent aggregation kinetics as well as changes in spray-dried particle morphology, a mechanism is proposed for the trehalose stabilization of proteins in solid state at elevated temperatures. The results reported here suggest that when fragment antibodies in the solid state are formulated with trehalose as excipient, a high temperature process such as hot-melt extrusion can be successfully accomplished with minimal degradation.

Identification of D-Amino Acids in Light Exposed mAb Formulations.

PURPOSE: We previously demonstrated that D-amino acids can form as a result of photo-irradiation of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) at both λ = 254 nm and λ > 295 nm (λmax = 305 nm), likely via reversible hydrogen transfer reactions of intermediary thiyl radicals. Here, we investigate the role of various excipients (sucrose, glucose, L-Arg, L-Met and L-Leu) on D-amino acid formation, and specifically the distribution of D-amino acids in mAb monomers and aggregates present after light exposure. METHODS: The mAb-containing formulations were photo-irradiated at λ = 254 nm and λmax = 305 nm, followed by fractionation of aggregate and monomer fractions using size exclusion chromatography. These aggregate and monomer fractions were subjected to hydrolysis and subsequent amino acid analysis. RESULTS: Both aggregate and monomer fractions collected from all formulations showed the formation of D-Glu and D-Val, whereas the formation of D-Ala was limited to the aggregate fraction collected from an L-Arg-containing formulation. Interestingly, quantitative analysis revealed higher yields of D-amino acids in the L-Arg-containing formulation. CONCLUSIONS: Generally, D-amino acids accumulated to similar extents in monomers and aggregates.

Fragmentation of a Monoclonal Antibody by Peroxotungstate.

PURPOSE: Tungsten and tungsten oxide leachates found in glass pre-filled syringes were identified to initiate protein precipitation and aggregation. Here, we tested the possibility of tungsten and tungsten oxide to induce the chemical degradation of proteins via reaction with hydrogen peroxide, a possible impurity present in protein formulations, to yield peroxotungstate. METHODS: A monoclonal antibody (mAb) was incubated with various concentrations of peroxotungstate and the reaction mixtures analyzed by SDS-PAGE and mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Exposure of a mAb to 1.07-1070 ppm peroxotungstate (based on tungsten content) at temperatures of 4°C and 22°C (pH 5-7) induced protein fragmentation. The extent of fragmentation increased with higher temperatures, lower pH and higher peroxotungstate concentrations. The mAb fragments were identified to contain different combinations of heavy chains (H) and light chains (L). Analogous mAb fragments were generated when the protein was exposed to H2O2 and orthotungstate at levels as low as 5 ppm. In addition, extracts from tungsten pins used to manufacture glass pre-filled syringes, in combination with H2O2 caused comparable fragmentation of the mAb. Mass spectrometric identification of the fragments suggests fragment generation by oxidative disulfide bond cleavage between the heavy and light chains, confirmed by mass spectrometry data on product formation. The mechanism of oxidative fragmentation was separately confirmed with insulin. CONCLUSION: Fragmentation of the mAb by peroxotungstate is proposed to occur through inter-chain disulfide bond oxidation to form thiosulfinate (CyS(═O)SCy) and thiosulfonate [CyS(═O)2SCy], followed by hydrolysis.

Determination of the Acceptable Ambient Light Exposure during Drug Product Manufacturing for Long-Term Stability of Monoclonal Antibodies.

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are exposed to light during drug product (DP) manufacturing, and the acceptable levels of light exposure needs to be determined based on the impact on product quality. In this study, a mild and more representative light model consisting of ambient light instead of stress light as prescribed by ICH Q1B was used to evaluate the impact of light exposure on mAb DP quality. The immediate effect of ambient light exposure on protein DP quality was determined to be dependent on the amount of light exposure rather than light intensity (up to 5000 lux). The impact on quality of mAbs is product specific due to their differences in light sensitivity, in which mAb II shows larger increases in IEC basic variants and larger decreases in SEC monomer when compared to mAb I after 0.24 million lux hours of light exposure. The acceptable ambient light exposure for mAb II DP manufacturing was determined to be 0.13 million lux hours, in which no impact on product quality was observed after the short-term light exposure. Additionally, real-time storage (5 °C) of the DP after the prescribed ambient light exposure showed no impact to various product quality attributes. The light model used in this study is capable of determining the acceptable amount of ambient light exposure for mAbs, especially during DP manufacturing processes.